Darkki (admin)254 rated books, 240 posts
"The Star Kings" by Edmond Hamilton was initially published as a novella in 1947, and later it was expanded into a full novel. During this expansion process, it's possible that the author made significant changes to the story, including the ending. Additionally, the book was reissued under the title "Beyond the Moon" in 1951, which could indicate further revisions or rebranding. Therefore, the differences you mentioned in the two versions might be a result of the author's edits and changes made when the novella was adapted into a novel or during its reissuing with a new title.
Ultimately, to determine the author's original intent, one would need to consult primary sources like Edmond Hamilton's notes, manuscripts, or any recorded statements he may have made about the work. Without such evidence, the question of which version was truly the original remains a matter of speculation and may vary based on personal interpretation.
My speculation is that Edmond Hamilton, like many authors, may have recognized the potential for a deeper and more intricate story within the universe he created. The expansion could have allowed him to explore the characters, the world-building, and the overarching plot in more detail. As a result, the differing endings could be a reflection of the author's creative growth and evolving vision for the story.
Is there anyone here with alternative suggestions or more creative solutions to consider? :)
"The Star Kings" by Edmond Hamilton was initially published as a novella in 1947, and later it was expanded into a full novel. During this expansion process, it's possible that the author made significant changes to the story, including the ending. Additionally, the book was reissued under the title "Beyond the Moon" in 1951, which could indicate further revisions or rebranding. Therefore, the differences you mentioned in the two versions might be a result of the author's edits and changes made when the novella was adapted into a novel or during its reissuing with a new title.
 
Ultimately, to determine the author's original intent, one would need to consult primary sources like Edmond Hamilton's notes, manuscripts, or any recorded statements he may have made about the work. Without such evidence, the question of which version was truly the original remains a matter of speculation and may vary based on personal interpretation.
 
My speculation is that Edmond Hamilton, like many authors, may have recognized the potential for a deeper and more intricate story within the universe he created. The expansion could have allowed him to explore the characters, the world-building, and the overarching plot in more detail. As a result, the differing endings could be a reflection of the author's creative growth and evolving vision for the story.
 
Is there anyone here with alternative suggestions or more creative solutions to consider? :)